In modern cloud-native environments, high availability and fault tolerance are essential for delivering reliable services. While Kubernetes does a great job with scheduling and scaling workloads, one often overlooked aspect is how those workloads are distributed across nodes or zones.
Have you ever deployed multiple replicas of an app and found them all running on the same node or in the same zone?
This kind of distribution might work — until that one node or zone goes down.
To combat this, Kubernetes offers a powerful feature called Pod Topology Spread Constraints. This feature allows you to control how your pods are distributed across failure domains like nodes, zones, or regions — minimizing downtime and ensuring better resource utilization.
When pods are not evenly spread, several issues can arise:
A node crash may take down all your replicas.
One noisy neighbor pod may affect all co-located pods.
Cluster upgrades or maintenance can cause unexpected downtime.
Resource bottlenecks can occur due to uneven load distribution.
To build resilient systems, it's important to ensure your workloads are not overly concentrated in one failure domain.
That’s where topology spread constraints come in.
Topology Spread Constraints allow Kubernetes to evenly distribute pods across different topology domains — such as zones or nodes — based on specific rules you define.
These rules let you specify:
Which topology key to use (e.g., zone, node)
How much skew is allowed (difference in number of pods per domain)
What to do if the spread constraint can't be satisfied
Here’s a basic example of how to apply topology spread constraints in your pod spec
In this example:
Pods with label app=your-app will be spread across zones.
The spread difference (skew) between zones won't exceed 1.
If the ideal placement isn’t possible, Kubernetes will still schedule the pod (ScheduleAnyway).
Let’s say you have three availability zones (A, B, and C).
If you deploy 6 replicas of a pod, Kubernetes will aim to schedule them like this:
Zone A: 2 pods
Zone B: 2 pods
Zone C: 2 pods
If one zone has an issue or high load, Kubernetes avoids scheduling all pods there — maintaining availability and balance.
Here are some key recommendations when using this feature:
Use meaningful labels to group pods.
Choose ScheduleAnyway for non-critical workloads to avoid blocking deployments.
Use DoNotSchedule for mission-critical apps where even spread is non-negotiable.
Combine with affinity/anti-affinity rules for more refined placement.
Use PodDisruptionBudgets (PDBs) alongside spread constraints for graceful rollouts and upgrades.
As your cluster scales, manual control over pod scheduling becomes impractical. Topology spread constraints give you declarative control, helping Kubernetes maintain balance automatically — especially in:
Multi-zone clusters
Hybrid cloud setups
On-prem environments with node groups
If you are managing stateful services, databases, or critical APIs, using these constraints can significantly improve your system's fault tolerance.